ONSIDER a verbal description of the effect of
gravity: drop a ball, and it will fall.
That is a true enough fact, but fuzzy in the way that frustrates
scientists. How fast does the ball fall? Does it fall at constant
rate, or accelerate? Would a heavier ball fall faster? More words,
more sentences could provide details, swelling into an unwieldy yet
still incomplete paragraph.
The wonder of mathematics is that it captures precisely in a few
symbols what can only be described clumsily with many words. Those
symbols, strung together in meaningful order, make equations - which
in turn constitute the world's most concise and reliable body of
knowledge. And so it is that physics offers a very simple equation
for calculating the speed of a falling ball.
Readers of Physics World magazine recently were asked an
interesting question: Which equations are the greatest?
Dr. Robert P. Crease, a professor of philosophy at the State
University of New York at Stony Brook and a historian at Brookhaven
National Laboratory, posed the question in his Critical Point column
and received 120 responses, nominating 50 different equations. Some
were nominated for the sheer beauty of their simplicity, some for
the breadth of knowledge they capture, others for historical
importance. In general, Dr. Crease said, a great equation "reshapes
perception of the universe."
The mathematical equation providing the speed of a falling ball
is just four symbols long: v = gt.
With it, you can calculate the ball's speed 2.5 seconds after
release. (That's g, the acceleration of gravity, which is 32 feet
per second squared, multiplied by 2.5 seconds, giving an answer of
80 feet per second.)
This equation, a mainstay of high school physics, was not among
those nominated as the greatest of all time, which is not
surprising, because its use is limited.
The pull of gravity varies with distance from the Earth's
surface, and the equation also suggests that an object's speed could
go on increasing toward infinity, past the known limit of the speed
of light.
The top vote-getters in the magazine poll were Maxwell's
equations - a set of four that describe the interplay between
electric and magnetic fields - and Euler's equation, a purely
mathematical construct that finds wide use in theoretical physics.
"It combines rational and irrational numbers to get zero," Dr.
Crease said. "It's bizarre."
Among the other nominees were the all-familiar E=mc2
from Einstein, which equates energy and matter; the Pythagorean
theorem; and Isaac Newton's F=ma.
Prominent scientists have their own favorites. Dr. Brian Greene,
a theorist at Columbia University and author of "The Elegant
Universe," cites Einstein's general relativity equations, which
describe how matter warps the fabric of space, and the Schrödinger
equation, the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics.
"With a mere handful of symbols, those equations describe almost
all phenomena in the universe," he said. "It is so amazing how so
much of the universe is encapsulated in a few symbols."
Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, director of the Hayden Planetarium, said
he was disappointed that E=mc2 did not receive more
votes. "I think the general physics community, they're a little
bored with the equation," he said. "It's risen to the level of icon
that people no longer pay attention to."
But Dr. Tyson said that the equation was a fundamental
underpinning not only of the universe, but also of the first five
chapters of his book "Origins."
"It's simple, yet profound," he said. "I'd be less impressed if
it were a big complicated equation."
A half-dozen of Dr. Crease's respondents, including Richard
Harrison of Calgary, Alberta, chose one of the simplest possible
equations.
Mr. Harrison wrote: " '1 + 1 = 2' is the fairy tale of
mathematics, the first equation I taught my son, the first
expression of the miraculous power of the mind to change the real
world. I remember my son holding up the index finger, the 'one
finger,' of each hand as he learned the expression, and the moment
of wonder, perhaps his first of true philosophical wonder, when he
saw that the two fingers, separated by his whole body, could be
joined in a single concept in his mind."